TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up their libraries:
Primetime Mystery: Where Did All the TV Viewers Go? - Derek Thompson via The Atlantic
The networks’ share of primetime TV audience (dark blue in the graph below [above in this post]) has declined from 45% in 1985 to 25% in 2009. Basic cable ate the networks’
lunchpost-dinner audience, and now it’s technology’s turn gobble up what’s left.Even with this long trend line (and despite the fact that viewers often unplug in the spring), there is a sense that we’ve reached a tipping point thanks to what Gaspin calls “built-up libraries.” There is more good stuff to watch not-on-live-TV than on live-TV, and even the head of entertainment at NBC knows it. Television technologies are dragging us away from live television, to a world of smaller screens, shifting “windows,” and no more ads. In 2000, a company called Netflix was experimenting with movie rentals. Now they have more than 20 million streaming customers. In 2005, about 1% of households owned DVRs. Today, it’s more than 40%. In 2006, Hulu didn’t exist. Today it has just under 30 million monthly uniques, with more than 1 million paying subscribers. In 2009, there were no iPads. Today, there are 60 million, and most of them are in the United States. That’s a Cambrian explosion of options for “watching TV” without literally watching an actual TV.
So people are ‘watching TV’ but not watching network programming in real time: they have defected from the ‘appointment TV’ model, or defected from broadcast and networks as the delivery mechanism for TV media.
PS DVR is a strange intermediary technology, one that foreshadowed keeping your TV shows in the cloud. (Apple’s iTunes in the cloud is poised to destroy the market for DVR devices.)
(h/t emergent futures)
The end of network TV This hardly surprises me, especially as someone who listens to more radio per week than watches television. I wonder if New Zealand has a similar trend—since I cannot see the point of pay TV, or forking out money for a medium I use less and less of. But, all the times I have stayed at hotels, I have found precious little on pay TV that I want to see.
10 Notes/ Hide
-
journo-geekery reblogged this from stoweboyd
-
ivesy likes this
-
obliterated1 reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
Ah that’s what I like - a graph that so clear you have to explain it in the first par of the accompanying copy….FFS...
-
dragoni likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from stoweboyd
-
jackyan reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
The end of network TV This hardly surprises me, especially as someone who listens to more radio per week than watches...
-
kenyatta likes this
-
futuresagency reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up...
-
stoweboyd posted this
![stoweboyd:
TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up their libraries:
Primetime Mystery: Where Did All the TV Viewers Go? - Derek Thompson via The Atlantic
The networks’ share of primetime TV audience (dark blue in the graph below [above in this post]) has declined from 45% in 1985 to 25% in 2009. Basic cable ate the networks’ lunch post-dinner audience, and now it’s technology’s turn gobble up what’s left.
Even with this long trend line (and despite the fact that viewers often unplug in the spring), there is a sense that we’ve reached a tipping point thanks to what Gaspin calls “built-up libraries.” There is more good stuff to watch not-on-live-TV than on live-TV, and even the head of entertainment at NBC knows it. Television technologies are dragging us away from live television, to a world of smaller screens, shifting “windows,” and no more ads. In 2000, a company called Netflix was experimenting with movie rentals. Now they have more than 20 million streaming customers. In 2005, about 1% of households owned DVRs. Today, it’s more than 40%. In 2006, Hulu didn’t exist. Today it has just under 30 million monthly uniques, with more than 1 million paying subscribers. In 2009, there were no iPads. Today, there are 60 million, and most of them are in the United States. That’s a Cambrian explosion of options for “watching TV” without literally watching an actual TV.
So people are ‘watching TV’ but not watching network programming in real time: they have defected from the ‘appointment TV’ model, or defected from broadcast and networks as the delivery mechanism for TV media.
PS DVR is a strange intermediary technology, one that foreshadowed keeping your TV shows in the cloud. (Apple’s iTunes in the cloud is poised to destroy the market for DVR devices.)
(h/t emergent futures)
The end of network TV This hardly surprises me, especially as someone who listens to more radio per week than watches television. I wonder if New Zealand has a similar trend—since I cannot see the point of pay TV, or forking out money for a medium I use less and less of. But, all the times I have stayed at hotels, I have found precious little on pay TV that I want to see.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3509nPzOP1qcz5rmo1_500.gif)