Jack Yan on Tumblr

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS

What Bill of Rights? CISPA explained. The American politicians’ thinking appears to be: stuff the Fourth Amendment.

    • #USA
    • #law
    • #privacy
    • #internet
  • 3 weeks ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
YouTube history, 2013 I remain absolutely astonished by YouTube’s lack of privacy. I turned the history off on this site, and blocked the YouTube cookie. Yet it still claims I have watched certain videos. Some I do recognize but the top half-dozen, I have never seen. Not only should I not have a viewing history, the one that YouTube claims I have is total bollocks. But, it is Google, and privacy breaches, false accusations and inexplicable technical behaviour are par for the course at that company.
Pop-upView Separately

YouTube history, 2013 I remain absolutely astonished by YouTube’s lack of privacy. I turned the history off on this site, and blocked the YouTube cookie. Yet it still claims I have watched certain videos. Some I do recognize but the top half-dozen, I have never seen. Not only should I not have a viewing history, the one that YouTube claims I have is total bollocks. But, it is Google, and privacy breaches, false accusations and inexplicable technical behaviour are par for the course at that company.

    • #Google
    • #YouTube
    • #privacy
    • #law
    • #USA
    • #ethics
  • 3 weeks ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

fishingboatproceeds:

CISPA is a nightmare.

CISPA A nice summary of CISPA and how it violates the Fourth Amendment.

(via prayingforlove)

Source: thinksquad

    • #law
    • #USA
    • #privacy
  • 4 weeks ago > thinksquad
  • 34372
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Google delays an all-clear for as long as it possibly can I am told by those in the know that Google takes about five hours to do a review. I have waited 16 now for today’s one. That’s on top of the six days our site has been blacklisted and libellous things written about us, just because Google cannot distinguish clean code from malicious code. (We know it can’t, since it makes malicious code anyway.)
Pop-upView Separately

Google delays an all-clear for as long as it possibly can I am told by those in the know that Google takes about five hours to do a review. I have waited 16 now for today’s one. That’s on top of the six days our site has been blacklisted and libellous things written about us, just because Google cannot distinguish clean code from malicious code. (We know it can’t, since it makes malicious code anyway.)

    • #Google
    • #hacking
    • #law
    • #USA
    • #privacy
  • 1 month ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

The dangers of using a cellphone for uploading photos on Facebook I’ve written statuses to myself before, and some to long-time friends (people I have known for years, if not decades). Earlier today I uploaded something for myself—which Facebook made public.

I was able to repeat this just now. I uploaded a random image and confirmed that the privacy settings were set to ‘close friends’. (Note that using this method to write statuses to a group works—just not photographs.) The image went up. Then, when rechecking on a desktop computer, I noticed that the image was open to pretty much everyone apart from two groups, and names from a now-deleted list.

I will report this as a bug to Facebook, but it goes to show just how lame their privacy settings are when you are not using a proper computer.

    • #Facebook
    • #privacy
    • #law
    • #USA
    • #software
    • #internet
    • #computing
  • 5 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Turning on ‘Do Not Track’ in Google Chrome

cnnmoneytech:

The promise of Do Not Track was supposed to be that with a simple push of the button, ad networks will no longer be able to track your online behavior.

Not only is Do Not Track the opposite of simple, it also does absolutely nothing.

To illustrate, here’s how Do Not Track was implemented in…

What can I say? About as useful as Google Ads Preferences Manager. It’s not in their interests to circumvent a golden goose that gives them $3,000 million a year.

    • #privacy
    • #law
    • #USA
    • #Google
    • #internet
    • #deception
  • 5 months ago > cnnmoneytech
  • 116
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Thoughts on the modern cellphone

This has been my year for acquiring new technology, beginning with a new external hard drive just after Christmas 2011, to a new desktop machine right after New Year. The keyboard, printer, scanner have all given way to replacements; while even the internet package and modem are new. TelstraClear then gave me a new 華為 (Huawei) cell and while I could hardly be called a typical user—it’s the last mode of communication with me and I don’t always carry it—the first few days (since Thursday) with the gadget suggests how I might change the way I consume technology.

First, the money. Because this device sucks up more bandwidth and because wifi in Wellington is still patchy (it might have been different if the mayoral race finished in a different order), I’ve opted to pay NZ$15 for extra megabytes each month. I’m already paying roughly that but that was on an old 3G device. It’s not a powerful device, which means there are foreseeable memory issues, and while I’ve stuck an old 2 Gbyte Micro SD card inside it, that’s not going to accommodate much now that the photos are larger, and the videos I store need to be.

The big screen needs to be protected: my Facebook feed had seen far too many complaints about broken Iphone screens, so I ordered a leather case on Ebay for under NZ$5. It sure beat one on Amazon for over US$30, plus shipping. Already this gadget is costing me and not gaining me much in efficiency. A new 32 Gbyte card will set me back another NZ$40 and I’m not convinced I need it yet for efficiency’s sake.

Secondly, the division of tasks: I can foresee the desktop machine being for the heavy-duty work stuff, as it is for a lot of people, and portable devices being used for leisure. Nothing earth-shattering or pioneering about that prediction. The apps still aren’t there yet, and what is more likely going to happen is that these devices become walking CPUs that communicate with more traditional peripherals, but for now, it’s been useful as a camera and social media tool. Which means the PC is for everything else. It is proof, to me, that Microsoft made the right punt with 8 as personal computing is shifting very rapidly this decade away from the desktop-bound model that started in the 1980s.

I doubt I will go to email on the go—the way I archive for legal reasons means that I’ll continue to use a traditional client and I still don’t trust the cloud for email—which points, again, to portable meaning leisure. It’s a camera, social media updater, and video player. Since I almost never give out the number, since that would mean succumbing to the technology and losing control over how I manage telephony, it’s not going to make the jump into a work tool.

It’s also not that reliable, which makes it largely a plaything. Just as I could crash Google Chrome in almost every session—earning it the dubious nickname of ‘the “Aw, snap” browser’—I can crash this one almost every hour. Since it’s Android, I assume the browser is made by Google. Plus everything is connected back to a Google account, and no matter how hard I try to maintain my privacy, Google will inevitably leak.

Google forced me to open a Gmail even though I had an existing Google Plus account. I’ve since deleted the Gmail but it remains associated with Google Play and its apps. After opening that, I went browsing through the Dashboard to find out some disturbing things. Even though I never linked my YouTube account with my Google one, Google still managed to track that I had viewed about a dozen videos from a few months ago. It had the history in YouTube turned on as well as targeted advertising, which I had clearly opted out of (and made a big hoo-ha about it at the time because of Google’s deceptive conduct—it shows that that deception never ended despite my getting the NAI involved). And, naturally, when you visit the YouTube privacy page, you get a 404—which shows how much Google cares about privacy.

I regularly turn off the apps and have a lot of the privacy locked down on the cell. But I don’t think the US and Australian governments have much to fear from China on these Huawei phones. Google is learning a lot, lot more about us than China ever could.

The keyboard is inefficient, though the design of it is as good as it can be. I can’t think of a better way.

Yet despite all this, there are plus sides. Mobile optimization for some sites is beautiful and the crash-prone browser renders things well. (A friend suggested Opera, and while I like the less graphics-intensive pages, it interprets pages with plenty of glitches, including spacing ones, which are less forgiving on a modern cell.) The Droid typeface family from Ascender Corp. has to be the number-one reason for making it appealing—my Iphone friends liked what they saw with the UI in general and felt it an improvement on what they have. And for those who are visually driven, rather than aurally, then the Huawei makes for a nice little device. I like the Tumblr app on it so some of my procrastination sites can be put on the gadget.

End of story: I’m far too ingrained in my habits to become a regular cell user. I’ll still leave it lying about at home for the most part. But on the days when I expect a call from someone, or when I need to take a quick photo, I can see it being indispensable—with much more pleasant graphics built in. And if it becomes the plaything for social media, then I might have fewer distractions when I do my real job on the desktop. Being able to divide the tasks, to me, is a very good thing—because it helps put me in charge of the technology again.

    • #technology
    • #cellphones
    • #Microsoft Windows
    • #TelstraClear
    • #New Zealand
    • #Aotearoa
    • #social networking
    • #Google
    • #privacy
    • #law
  • 6 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
YouTube privacy The screen you get to when you click ‘Manage privacy’ for YouTube from Google Dashboard. Why am I not surprised?
View Separately

YouTube privacy The screen you get to when you click ‘Manage privacy’ for YouTube from Google Dashboard. Why am I not surprised?

    • #YouTube
    • #law
    • #Google
    • #privacy
    • #USA
    • #ethics
  • 6 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
rubbishcorp:

Privacyfix is a simple little Chrome & Firefox Add-On that enables anyone (with one of those browsers) to monitor and adjust Facebook and Google privacy settings. The add-on gives you instant warning signs on the settings that you’ll want to take a look at and enables you go directly to the place where you can change those settings.If you are in anyway worried about your online privacy (which you probably should be) this is well worth installing.
Here.

Browser privacy check Not a bad idea. When I think about it, it’s actually surprising it’s taken this long for something like this to come out.
Pop-upView Separately

rubbishcorp:

Privacyfix is a simple little Chrome & Firefox Add-On that enables anyone (with one of those browsers) to monitor and adjust Facebook and Google privacy settings. The add-on gives you instant warning signs on the settings that you’ll want to take a look at and enables you go directly to the place where you can change those settings.

If you are in anyway worried about your online privacy (which you probably should be) this is well worth installing.

Here.

Browser privacy check Not a bad idea. When I think about it, it’s actually surprising it’s taken this long for something like this to come out.

(via ajaymurthy)

Source: rubbishcorp

    • #Facebook
    • #Google
    • #privacy
    • #law
    • #internet
    • #Web 2·0
  • 7 months ago > rubbishcorp
  • 6
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Two simple questions about the Facebook privacy leak

I wrote the below in response to another article about the Facebook private message SNAFU, but the site then forced me to register. So I’m sharing it here instead.

A couple of things people are ignoring here. Given the level of Timeline paranoia when it first came up, don’t you think out of 800 million users, someone would have noticed this when scanning back through the years? Why has it surfaced just now?

My theory is that some messages between 2007 and 2009 were miscategorized. I can confirm that in my download of all Facebook data in 2011, these private posts were mixed in with the wall ones, giving Facebook’s claims some cred. However, they never showed up in my annual summaries on Timeline till now, since I had checked them all last year.

The other question one has to ask is: why and how did 500 million Facebook users suddenly wise up to private messaging at the dawn of 2010?

    • #Facebook
    • #bugs
    • #errors
    • #bug
    • #privacy
  • 7 months ago
  • 2
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 5

About

Avatar Quick and mostly irrelevant thoughts from a brand consultant, author, magazine publisher, typeface designer and Wellington mayoral candidate. Authorized by C. Johnston, 35–8 Cambridge Terrace, Wellington.

Other places

  • @jackyan on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • Linkedin Profile

My main blog
Jack Yan & Associates
Lucire
Autocade, the car cyclopædia

Likes

  • Photo via onlyjusstine
    Photo via onlyjusstine
  • Photo via insequential
    Photo via insequential
  • Photo via absolutelyinlovewithhim
    Photo via absolutelyinlovewithhim
  • Photoset via integers
    Photoset via integers
  • Photo via reckon

    Not for sale.

    Photo via reckon
  • Photo via sliceonline

    Spot on :). Ping @akrogirl / #InstagramHumor - w/ #Nadine // source: Göteborgs-Posten - ‘Imy’ at Veolia Tåg 3941 – View on Path.

    Photo via sliceonline
See more →


Twitter

loading tweets…

Following

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Mobile

Original contributions copyright ©2007–12 by Jack Yan. Effector Theme by Pixel Union.

Powered by Tumblr